Battle of Britain Combatants

Discussion in 'World War 2' started by Keith, Jan 20, 2009.

  1. Keith

    Keith New Member

    Hi Plane Lovers,
    For a bit more detail of our favourite pairs.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Keith

    Keith New Member

    B. o B. Combatants

    Even more pictures of the upgradings that took place.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Keith

    Keith New Member

    B. of B. Combatants

    More comparative pictures for the battle for supremacy (last pair in the series)
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Antipodean Andy

    Antipodean Andy New Member

    With the Mk IX, the Spit developed to meet the Fw190 on more even terms, I think Supermarine finally developed a mass-produced Spit that was completely superior to the '109. My opinion only. Earlier Spits could be outclimbed etc by the early '109s, the F in particular, which meant the Germans could dictate the fight somewhat as they did during Fighter Command's 1941 offensive.

    Looking at the stubby wings of the '109G - no wonder they were bloody hard to fly.
     
  5. Kyt

    Kyt Άρης

    I know the later marks were faster, stronger and better armed but I still like the lines of the Mk I. The flush wings, without the cannon bulges etc. And I just think the bubble canopy was so wrong!!
     
  6. Antipodean Andy

    Antipodean Andy New Member

    Totally agree, Kyt. There's almost something innocent about the Mk I! The clipped wings on the Mk Vs make them look like sports coupes I reckon. Add bulges for the Griffon as well and, well, she's still a Spit and still better looking than anything that ever flew but...

    Keith, have you got a comparison three-view of a F Mk 24 (the last land-based Spit) or a Mk XVIII (the last variant to enter service before war's end)?
     
  7. Keith

    Keith New Member

    B o B

    Hi Andy,
    I'll have a look through a few books I have on the Spitfire.
    The very late Mks had no charisma so attracted less attention or interest.
    Cheers
    Keith.
     
  8. Antipodean Andy

    Antipodean Andy New Member

    Oh, they had charisma, Keith, they just shoved it down your throat!
     
  9. Keith

    Keith New Member

    B. o B.

    Nothing of any real note yet, but I'll carry on tomorrow.
    Thought this may be of interest.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Antipodean Andy

    Antipodean Andy New Member

    Love comparing dimensions, weights etc of the Mk I and the 24, even the last Seafire. Signs of a good design being that adaptable!
     
  11. Kyt

    Kyt Άρης

  12. Kyt

    Kyt Άρης

  13. Gage

    Gage New Member

    Like has been said, I prefer the MkI and the Emil, something about those early 1940 aircraft.
     
  14. Kyt

    Kyt Άρης

  15. Adrian Roberts

    Adrian Roberts Active Member

    They really should have given the Griffon-engined Spitfires a different name; they were very different aircraft. They did eventually give a new name to its final, post-war development: the Spiteful, and its naval equivalent the Seafang. Neither of these went into production, but in fact the extent to which they differed from the F.24 was arguably less than the "jump" between some Spitfire marks.

    By the middle of the war, it was the FW190 that really gave us problems. ACM Sholto Douglas described it as the best fighter in the world in mid-42, in a letter to Lord Beaverbrook. At medium and high altitudes, the Spitfire IX could just about hold its own; at low level only the Typhoon could cope with it. The Spitfire XII (the first Griffon variant) was the first Spitfire superior to the FW190 at all levels.

    At the risk of lowering the tone of all this: check out the name on the lower cowling of the Spitfire FRXIV in Keith's post above - people who queried this were told it was an ancient Scottish battlecry!
     
  16. Gage

    Gage New Member

  17. Keith

    Keith New Member

    F 24


    Hi Andy,
    Best I can do at the moment

    Cheers
    Keith
     

    Attached Files:

    • WW24.jpg
      WW24.jpg
      File size:
      289.4 KB
      Views:
      399
  18. Keith

    Keith New Member

    Do 332

    Hi Andy,

    How about some nice drawings of Hitler's fastest piston driven fighter?
    Not a very well know plane, but it should be !
    This is the Do 335 ver.
    Cheers
    Keith
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Adrian Roberts

    Adrian Roberts Active Member

    Lucky for us it didn't enter service. Overcomplex of course; I wonder if there was anything it could do that a FW Ta152 or a ME262 jet couldn't do just as well. Probably the Luftwaffe wanted the 335 as a backup in case the ME262 and its jet engines proved unsuccessful.

    Nice of them to develop an ejection seat for the pilot to stop him being shredded by the rear propellor if he had to bale out. The first operational ejection seat was that fitted to the Saab J21A; again this had a pusher propeller behind the pilot.
     
  20. war hawk

    war hawk New Member

    [QUOTE= she's still a Spit and still better looking than anything that ever flew.

    Is the Spitfire the best looking plane that ever fleW? . My opinion is that it is in the top 4 for best looking planes.:happy: I think the Spit is a great looking plane but I like alot of planes. I know we all differ in opinions.:blah::crazy: Well here is some of my fav planes Me-109, Corsair, Hellcat.
     

Share This Page