Why Japan Really Lost The War

Discussion in 'World War 2' started by spidge, Sep 17, 2007.

  1. spidge

    spidge Active Member

    Nearly twice the population of Japan.
    Seventeen time's Japan's national income.
    Five times more steel production.
    Seven times more coal production.
    Eighty (80) times the automobile production.


    Furthermore, America had some hidden advantages that didn't show up directly in production figures. For one, U.S. factories were, on average, more modern and automated than those in Europe or in Japan. Additionally, American managerial practice at that time was the best in the world. Taken in combination, the per capita productivity of the American worker was the highest in the world. Furthermore, the United States was more than willing to utilize American women in the war effort: a tremendous advantage for us, and a concept which the Axis Powers seem not to have grasped until very late in the conflict. The net effect of all these factors meant that even in the depths of the Depression, American war-making potential was still around seven times larger than Japan's, and had the 'slack' been taken out in 1939, it was closer to nine or ten times as great! In fact, accroding to Kennedy, a breakdown of total global warmaking potential in 1937 looks something like this:

    [SIZE=+1]Country[/SIZE] [SIZE=+1]% of Total Warmaking Potential[/SIZE]
    United States
    41.7%
    Germany
    14.4%
    USSR
    14.0%
    UK 10.2%
    France 4.2%
    Japan
    3.5%
    Italy
    2.5%
    Seven Powers (total)
    (90.5%)

    When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in December 1941, the sleeping giant was awakened and came looking for trouble. And even though the majority of America's war-making potential was slated for use against Germany (which was by far the most dangerous of the Axis foes, again for reasons of economics), there was still plenty left over for use against Japan. By mid-1942, even before U.S. force of arms was being dramatically felt globally, American factories were nevertheless beginning to make a material effect in the war's progress. The U.S. churned out seemingly endless quantities of equipment and provision which were then funnelled to not only our own forces, but to those of Great Britain and the USSR as well. By 1944, most of the other powers in the war, though still producing furiously, were beginning to max out their economies (i.e. production was stabilizing or plateauing). This resulted from destruction of industrial bases and constriction of resource pools (in the case of Germany and Japan), or through sheer exhaustion of manpower (in the case of Great Britain and, to an extent, the USSR). By contrast, the United States suffered from none of these difficulties, and as a consequence its economy grew at an annual rate of 15% throughout the war years. As scary as it sounds, by the end of the war, the United States was really just beginning to get 'warmed up.' It is perhaps not surprising that in 1945, the U.S. accounted for over 50% of total global GNP.



    http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm
     
  2. morse1001

    morse1001 Guest

    Very interesting posting on the economic impact on the various countries engaged in the war.
     

Share This Page